Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:11:44AM -0500, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Robin Lee Powell
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:09:05PM -0500, Oren wrote:
> >> This lengthy conversation seems like a stark gap in
> >> interpretation of a moderately used word. Doesn't LLC have some
> >> like, official example sentence that explains the usage of a
> >> word? Isn't this what those cmavo definitions are for? It seems
> >> really silly to watch this go back and forth without any
> >> examples.
> >
> > You mean LLG.
> >
> > I haven't been paying attention, because PC (John Clifford) was
> > involved, and that's just how I roll.  I had been under the
> > impression they were arguing over the semantics of UI in
> > general, and potentially new UI in particular.  If they're
> > arguing over the meaning of particular word, which one?
> 
> Originally, da'oi (an experimental COI some people have proposed).
> Then it was dai for a while, and now it's mostly pei.

*nod*

If someone wants to summarize the confusion over dai and pei and put
it in the appropriate BPFK section, or email it to me, I'd
appreciate the help.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.