Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation

[Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:11:44AM -0500, Craig Daniel wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Robin Lee Powell
>> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:09:05PM -0500, Oren wrote:
>> >> This lengthy conversation seems like a stark gap in
>> >> interpretation of a moderately used word. Doesn't LLC have some
>> >> like, official example sentence that explains the usage of a
>> >> word? Isn't this what those cmavo definitions are for? It seems
>> >> really silly to watch this go back and forth without any
>> >> examples.
>> >
>> > You mean LLG.
>> >
>> > I haven't been paying attention, because PC (John Clifford) was
>> > involved, and that's just how I roll.  I had been under the
>> > impression they were arguing over the semantics of UI in
>> > general, and potentially new UI in particular.  If they're
>> > arguing over the meaning of particular word, which one?
>>
>> Originally, da'oi (an experimental COI some people have proposed).
>> Then it was dai for a while, and now it's mostly pei.
>
> *nod*
>
> If someone wants to summarize the confusion over dai and pei and put
> it in the appropriate BPFK section, or email it to me, I'd
> appreciate the help.

On it. But not tonight; I should go to bed.

 - mi'e .kreig.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.