Re: [lojban] Re: How it should have been. And how it could be.

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

  No, no, the point is that both of those works (And many others) have
ALREADY been translated into lojban.


On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  So, what?  You don't think the book of Esther is "important"?  (or,
>> heck, "Alice in Wonderland"?)
>>       --gejyspa
>
>
> Certainly it is.
>
> The problem with translating the Bible is that it would be a blatant
> renouncement to cultural "neutrality" of Lojban.   But I don't condemn
> this neither, I find the Bible a very good book, as for myself.
>
> "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" is a tricky one, because it is
> already a parody of other books and rhyme songs... and it is a second
> degree book.  I think it would be wiser to translate a "normal" book
> first (so, Esther, if you like).
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.