Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:30 PM, John E. Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
>   But a Classifier that is only implicit, never overt, is somewhat suspect linguistically.  And that view does go against 55 years of history (with occasional odd moments).

So what did you mean when you said that Lojban thinking would take the
number [of djacu] to be the number of separate puddles or whatever.
Wouldn't "separate puddles" be an implicit classifier in "ci djacu"?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.