[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another

To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 12:34:19 -0300
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Bcek+or4YeYlmaNzXVT/x1tH+j3Ieqy63KmO9n2bMCU=; b=VCf8seoOyRSXPKckbNdqPrPR2LTTlJANe1gi8xwsC0C7rZlMHhYZ5+zEkuyjACBX41 BFi5gHtEhJWgz6beQXuFD+SeX2baiCzTd6cz/MyzG/Kt2hebmmaBUeFme58yzLBNJ4K8 rL0T2pkjIzP3cHBvRgeNrQ+aojd52KZV/49P0=
In-reply-to: <1322925914.50485.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <20111203000124.GE11472@gonzales> <20111203002052.GA16395@gonzales> <CAO7tK2fdxyXA_bMKChfbZ3ayBy3BtX1Os-qCuoco0B2Draz=hw@mail.gmail.com> <1322925914.50485.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:25 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well, not really, "only" is different from "all and only" (necessary v.
> necessary and sufficient).

But if "one another" means "all non-self", then "only one another"
means "all non-self and only".

Otherwise, if no critic admires anyone it would be true that some
critics admire only one another, which seems wrong.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>

References:
- [lojban] some critics admire only one another
  - From: Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>
- Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
  - From: Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>
- Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
  - From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread