Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiktionary closure proposal.

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>  ...Dikyjvo....
>
> You mean jvajvo. That's not the correct use of diklo.

Actually IIRC the preferred term when discussing them in Lojban is
seljvajvo, because they're bound by rules rather than being rules. But
"dikyjvo" is the traditional name because it was coined first even
though it is, in fact, totally wrong.

Past experience has shown me that we Lojbanists care much more about correctness than tradition. Also, jvajvo is a lujvo meaning {javni lo lujvo}. lujvo can not be se javni.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.