On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
...jvajvo is a lujvo meaning {javni lo lujvo}. lujvo can not be se javni.
I must correct myself. The definition I gave is for jvojva.
I'll try again.
Lujvo can be defined however we like, and are not required to precisely mimic the bridi they represent. Also, as far as I am aware, it is not possible for a lujvo (, or any other kind of word, for that matter, ) to be a rule. As such, there is no problem with defining lo jvajvo cu lujvo fi'o se javni
-- mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.