|
Am 28.08.2012 23:51, schrieb John E
Clifford:
I can't speak for anybody else, but to me this distinction is irrelevant. "lo" is usually veridical, which means you call things "lo broda" that you think brodas. However, you can just as easily use lo broda for something that you aren't sure brodas, .i.e "lo ru'a broda" - "something that I assume brodas". Because of this, veridicality is not something that we need "le" for either. I personally have no use for "le" (which is why I think it would be better to reassign it a new (unrelated) function, but this would digress too far from the topic of this thread.) mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo ^:i \jl /flr sen |ziu \su xn go kror ^:i \sym tfn /zu viw \xn jy ^jaiw-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. |