Re: [lojban] baby words, sort of: catlu vs. zgana

[la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

On Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:04:40 PM UTC+4, selpa'i wrote:
> Am 22.09.2012 19:02, schrieb Ian Johnson:
> > {mi viska lo plise noi farlu}. With some more twiddling you can force 
> > simultaneity if you care about it.
>
> Or just "mi viska lo nu lo plise cu farlu".

Hey, yes and no. That's the point. If lo se viska can be an abstraction then my new gismu work. If not then I'll have to revert back to less backward-compatible 3-argument predicates. Both my suggestions can be found on http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section:+sensory+gismu

> mu'o mi'e la selpa'i
>
> -- 
> pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo
>
> doị mèlbi mlenì'u
>     .i do càtlu ki'u
> ma fe la xàmpre ŭu
>     .i do tìnsa càrmi
> gi'e sìrji se tàrmi
>     .i taị bo pu cìtka lo gràna ku

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/cECROWJpj94J.
 
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.