Re: [lojban] baby words, sort of: catlu vs. zgana

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

The whole point was that this approach has issues, or at least can be viewed as having issues. Frankly that point has some substance to it. Events don't emit or reflect light, so in a strict sense they cannot be "seen". Arguably {viska} should be our word for strict "seeing".

mu'o mi'e la latro'a

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:04 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:

Am 22.09.2012 19:02, schrieb Ian Johnson:

{mi viska lo plise noi farlu}. With some more twiddling you can force simultaneity if you care about it.

Or just "mi viska lo nu lo plise cu farlu".

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

doị mèlbi mlenì'u
   .i do càtlu ki'u
ma fe la xàmpre ŭu
   .i do tìnsa càrmi
gi'e sìrji se tàrmi
   .i taị bo pu cìtka lo gràna ku

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.

To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.