Re: [lojban] Robin retry: commands.

[MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com>]

I would much prefer a different example, one that doesn't say paying taxes is an ethical obligation. 

stevo

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:06 AM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:

On 26 May 2013 05:45, la arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
> For me {.e'i}=to have to
> {.ei} = should/ought to
>
> May be experts in English can explain later the difference between them but I'm pretty sure I can feel it. So I don't want to lose those two meanings.

Could this be an example?

"Apple doesn't have to pay taxes (no legal constraint), but they ought to (ethical obligation)."

mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.