Le dimanche 22 décembre 2013 22:49:13 UTC+1, aionys a écrit :
As I said, I'm not talking about pro-sumti.
I think bare letteral {denpa bu} acts as a pro-sumti. That's why I fail to understand your sentence the way I believe it is meant to be understood.
>The Dot Side doesn't refer to using letterals as pro-sumti, as in the
{by.} in {la.benjis. gerku .i by. barda}. It refers to
>the practice of
leading cmevla with a "." so that the letteral groups "la", "lai", and "doi" can be used in them. (As for
>example {la.doitcland.} or {la.las,andjeles.}).
I understand that. But Dot Side doesn't change the way bare letterals are interpreted as anaphora. The weird thing about {denpa bu} as an anaphora is that it is unlikely to be used as such, since the words it could possibly refer to can't start with denpa bu. (Although, technically, they can, since every 'vowel-initial' word starts with {.V…}, but the canonical anaphora is of course {.V bu}, not {denpa bu}. Which makes sense.)
I think that {me'o denpa bu} is the way to say 'dot' (in the lerfu sense), cf. <http://dag.github.io/cll/17/10/>. But I'll be happy to be corrected, I tend to not get the subtleties.
(By the way, {lasandjeles} is not a well-formed word, even under Dot Side; {ndj} is not a valid cluster.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.