[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: fu'ivla for liquors
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: fu'ivla for liquors
- From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:03:57 -0800 (PST)
- Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:12:10 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1290618238; bh=xYAwbRn+DOXhU/Km/SRbTPVW9hhU+UCznKbeuq9HG/8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xIqnddfrozitqYiHzpCXMNlJ3vPxROCRFToSRMIe2+hWDHraWgkEFa7Iywf1CYAqk3D5aFSS/hTmN5vaP1sjtuN4vg4KNcKh9pqOOcuB9MNvt0hlVQIIrIqldNLyM2kcn/r14gs6sDmNjpXRVn7dsT5PpLKZH7DOF9UbYKnToak=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2IiPrTvNy7kjSAYiIoRI8wDvRLFFprvHthNWeGupjjy8JGE6Hasfbrm8JUyg6dcWqAIXZLEJaeHSlGZtsagyuh8tOjygkkTMQXPYHLtrNqvfXbGk8ejugbR00xz9duZitJa9DHVTIX48mc3k/X2cG6hvxN4B/jNLHF/91SMOj0Y=;
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <20101124151934.GA12462@alice.local>
- References: <770898.27481.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201011232247.21133.phma@phma.optus.nu> <956656.46566.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20101124151934.GA12462@alice.local>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
> > > >
> > > > 1) koinka (cognac)
> > >
> >
> > Which brings up the issue of what exactly 'cognac' and 'champagne' mean.
> > Strictly speaking, cognacs and champagnes come from very specific areas in
> > France. If they don't, then they are brandies and sparkling wines.
> >
> > However, in most countries, colloquially (wine) brandy and sparkling wine
> > ARE referred to as 'cognac' and 'champagne'. My view nonetheless is that we
> > should stick to the strict definition, but I'm open to arguement.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
>
> I broadly agree that we should stick to the strict definitions.
So {fonvanju} for 'sparkling wines'?
totus