On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Oren <
get.oren@gmail.com> wrote:
> The two sentences below were not my doing! These were the proposed earlier
> in the thread by Pierre Abbat and Luke Bergen, respectively.
>
> Both contain a "sel" prefix, which I know has something to do with a "second
> conversion," but in this context, I can't find an explanation for why it's
> necessary-- we're just making a tanru right? I've skimmed both CLL and
> level 0. If someone can help me understand why 'sel-' is added to these, I
> would be very grateful!
>
> mu'omi'e .ku'us.
>
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 00:01, Pierre Abbat <
phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>>
>> > 1. *.i nalcertu ke fanva selcpedu
>> > .i lo to'e certu selfanva bo cpedu*
>> >
>> > Can someone explain or point me to where I can learn about why adding
>> > 'sel' is necessary?
>>
>> I think you're confusing the place structures of "cpedu" and "preti". lu
>> ma
>> zasti? li'u preti zo'e mi do .iku'i mi cpedu lu ko ga'orgau le canko li'u
>> do.
>