[lojban-beginners] Re: ok, lambda/currying-geeks needed (was Re: Re: "Once More")

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 12/15/05, Sunnan <sunnan@handgranat.org> wrote:
> I guess I'll have to take a look at the full BNF myself one of these
> days; I keep coming up with crazy things like "tibu". (I haven't slept!
> Please forgive me.)

{tibu} is a perfectly good lerfu. I have no idea what it could be used
for though. In any case, it can't go directly in front of {re'u}, but
something like {pa tibu re'u} is grammatical, even if we never
considered what it could mean. (I think numbers should consist
of PA only, for different reasons, but that's yet anoher matter.)

> (Wait. Does that mean that I should've written mi pu terxa'a fe la
> xorxes ku.i'e ?

No, {la CMENE} does not (cannot in fact) take a terminator.

(I would rather CMENE behaved just like BRIVLA
syntactically in every respect, but currently they don't.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes