On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:Strictly speaking, from a syntactic point of view, it separates two sentences.
>
> {.i} begins a new sentence, not ends an old one, I know this.
(1) broda .i brode
(2) .i broda .i brode
(3) broda .i brode .i
(4) .i broda .i brode .i
All four are grammatically correct. (1) is the normal use, since the
others contain unnecessary separators.
"vau" terminates a bridi-tail, but not necessarily a whole sentence.
> {vau} is actually the Lojban word for the English period,
In this sentence:
ko'a broda ko'e ko'i (vau) gi'e brode ko'o vau ko'u
The first "vau" can be elided, and terminates the (broda ko'e ko'i)
bridi-tail. The second "vau" is not elidable, it terminates the (brode
ko'o vau) bridi-tail, and allows the following term, "ko'u" to be
shared by the two connected bridi, just like the initial term "ko'a".
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.