[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: {le} in xorlo (was: Re: Response to Robin's "Essay on the future of Lojban"
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With the LE KU grammar, however, bringing it up feels more okay. So:
> can we get LA KU as well?
LA is allowed anywhere that LE is (but not vice-versa).
We would also have: "LE relative-clause KU" (as well as the more
obvious "LE KU relative-clause")
The nice thing about "LE relative-clause" is that it is just like
Spanish. English doesn't allow that construction, but Spanish does.
And it makes poi'i/seka sort of redundant to "lo poi ge broda gi broda".
Yes, this definitely should be allowed.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.