Re: [lojban] Re: {le} in xorlo (was: Re: Response to Robin's "Essay on the future of Lojban"

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

What in the world for?




----- Original Message ----
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, April 22, 2010 6:08:07 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: {le} in xorlo (was: Re: Response to Robin's "Essay  on the future of Lojban"

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 12, 8:20 pm, And Rosta <and.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm also wondering whether there exists an experimental
>> specific KOhA, a nonanaphoric "it/them". (I think I used to
>> use "le du" in lieu of such.)
>
> I've been using {le co'e} for this for quite a while, and I too
> wish I had a KOhA for it.  It feels like a language hole.

That reminds me, someone once proposed making "LE KU" grammatical.
That's perfectly doable grammar-wise, and it immediately gives not
only "le ku" but also "lo ku" (= zo'e), "loi ku", "lei ku", "lo'e ku"
(=zu'i?), "le'e ku", "lo'i ku", "le'i ku" in case anyone ever needs
them.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.