On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:Yes.
> ok, so forgetting the fatci bit, you're saying that these two following
> bridi are different?
> 1) mi na kakne lo nu tolmo'i lo du'u do tolmo'i
> 2) mi na kakne lo nu tolmo'i lo du'u do tolmo'i makau
Of course there are situatons in which (1) and (2) could both be true.
> I read {lo du'u do tolmo'i} as {lo du'u do tolmo'i zo'e} and the way I
> understand {zo'e} is that it can be anything (including makau).
So you agree they are different. Just as different as:
> So I see 2
> as being a more specific version of 1. Am I wrong here?
I can't forget that you've forgotten.
I can't forget what you've forgotten.--
mu'o mi'e xorxes
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.