[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] gender
On 11/18/2011 06:35 AM, Sebastian Fröjd wrote:
> So what do you think about this definition?
>
> fetyjavnakykai: c1=n1=f1 has/is characterized by evidencing male or(/and)
> female traits/aspects c2=n2=f2 (ka) of species n2=f2; x1 has the sex/gender
> of being male or(/and) female of species x3.
>
> Notes: x2 may be biological and/or sociological defined; x2 may be a
> general definition (male/female) or based on particular
> characteristics/traits (biological (xadni), state of external genitalia
> (pinji or plibu), internal genitalia (ganti), sexual/social norms (te
> cinse/jikca) etc).
There are more than two genders.
How about if we just let {cinse} mean gender, and move sexuality to
{gledji}?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.