[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
On 07/12/2012 11:46 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> I'm saying that the English word "gender" is too broad to be one Lojban
> word, and that the only portion of it that is important is biological.
> Societal gender is not, to me, important at all. It doesn't matter to me
> what gender- in any sense of the word- a person is, except in the
> biological sense, and even then, only for reasons of biological/medicinal
> purposes. (Like if I want to have kids, or I need to treat a relevant
> illness.)
Even if you personally don't care about societal gender, it's still a
thing that a lot of people care about and are affected by. You don't get
to delete words from the dictionary just because they aren't to your taste.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
- References:
- [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: ".arpis." <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
- From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>