Re: [lojban] la snime blabi

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Michael Turniansky
<mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> ".i ny za'u re'u pensi" is grammatical, even though it doesn't parse
>> as intended, just like ".i ca pensi", because "ny za'u re'u" is a
>> tense. If a parser doesn't like it, there is a problem with the
>> parser.
>
>   You mean like in the sense that "vei ny za'u ve'o gerku cu bunre" is
> grammatical?  I see no evidence to support a
> lerfu-string-as-mathematical-construct before a ROI.  18.11 doesn't list it,
> and neither is it mentioned as a possibility in 10.9

Oops, you're right. It's not grammatical.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.