Re: [lojban] la snime blabi

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 26.07.2012 21:19, schrieb Michael Turniansky:
>
> " ni'o ba na'e zu ku ca lo vanci lo ze torcrida cu xruti lo zdani gi'e mutce
> lo ka se spaji kei ca lo nu viska lo nu la snime blabi cu cpana lo loldi
> gi'e na muvdu fi'o selmlu lo ka morsi "
>   It seems like you are trying to say "not long after..." but unfortunately,
> "ba na'e zu" is not grammatical  "ba nai zu" is, but may not mean what we
> want.  I expect you would be better off simply doing "ba za" or "ba zi".
>
> I don't see the problem. NAhE TAG is grammatical, and so is na'e zu.

"ba [ku] na'e zu ku" is grammatical, but some parsers have trouble
with the elided "ku" in such cases. camxes parses it fine though.
Probably what gejyspa meant is that "ba na'e zu" does not parse as a
single compound tense the way "ba zu" does. This would be solved by
this proposal: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Internal+grammar+of+tags

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.