[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] la snime blabi





On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 26.07.2012 21:19, schrieb Michael Turniansky:
>
> " ni'o ba na'e zu ku ca lo vanci lo ze torcrida cu xruti lo zdani gi'e mutce
> lo ka se spaji kei ca lo nu viska lo nu la snime blabi cu cpana lo loldi
> gi'e na muvdu fi'o selmlu lo ka morsi "
>   It seems like you are trying to say "not long after..." but unfortunately,
> "ba na'e zu" is not grammatical  "ba nai zu" is, but may not mean what we
> want.  I expect you would be better off simply doing "ba za" or "ba zi".
>
> I don't see the problem. NAhE TAG is grammatical, and so is na'e zu.

"ba [ku] na'e zu ku" is grammatical, but some parsers have trouble
with the elided "ku" in such cases. camxes parses it fine though.
Probably what gejyspa meant is that "ba na'e zu" does not parse as a
single compound tense the way "ba zu" does. This would be solved by
this proposal: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Internal+grammar+of+tags

mu'o mi'e xorxes


 mi ckire do lo ka krici tu'a mi kei doi xorxes .iku'isa'u mi je'u uinairo'e na morji lo du'u ka'e pilno cei broda zo na'e ce'o lo cmavo be zoi gy tense gy .i mi no roi broda .i mi pilno zo na'e tu'a fu'e po'o lo selbri ku jo'u lo sumti  .i da'i mi djica lo nu dutygau lo cmavo .ibo mi pilno zo nai .i mi ckire re do lo nu mojgau mi

           --gejyspa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.