Re: [lojban] la snime blabi

[selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>]

Am 27.07.2012 00:28, schrieb Jorge Llambías:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Am 26.07.2012 21:19, schrieb Michael Turniansky:
> >
> > " ni'o ba na'e zu ku ca lo vanci lo ze torcrida cu xruti lo zdani gi'e mutce
> > lo ka se spaji kei ca lo nu viska lo nu la snime blabi cu cpana lo loldi
> > gi'e na muvdu fi'o selmlu lo ka morsi "
> >    It seems like you are trying to say "not long after..." but unfortunately,
> > "ba na'e zu" is not grammatical  "ba nai zu" is, but may not mean what we
> > want.  I expect you would be better off simply doing "ba za" or "ba zi".
> >
> > I don't see the problem. NAhE TAG is grammatical, and so is na'e zu.
>
> "ba [ku] na'e zu ku" is grammatical, but some parsers have trouble
> with the elided "ku" in such cases. camxes parses it fine though.
> Probably what gejyspa meant is that "ba na'e zu" does not parse as a
> single compound tense the way "ba zu" does. This would be solved by
> this proposal: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Internal+grammar+of+tags

I am aware of this proposal, and I don't really consider it a "proposal" 
as much as a necessity for the language to be consistent, which is why I 
pretend it's already "official". There is no way it won't be.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.