Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:31 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:

Well, Lojbab's position is close to incomprehensible to me, too, but he has maintained it for several days now without falter: if {la tsani} is somebody's name, then {la tsani be zo'e} is that person's name as well, just as if {lo tsani} is a correct description of a thing {lo tsani be zo'e} is.

(Underline added for clarity.)

This is itself slightly controversial, essentially because it is occasionally impractical. Some of us have started thinking of the default unfilled place as {zi'o .u zo'e}, essentially "while I'm not explicitly claiming that there is something here, you should keep in mind that there might be."

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.