[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Specifying sumti types: another revision of gimste is complete


2014-06-17 1:58 GMT+04:00 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
porsi1 is for the sequence, not for the ordered members of the sequence, so it isn't plural, just like gunma1 or linji1 are not plural. I understand "lo ci porsi" to be three sequences, not three things in a sequence, which would be "lo ci te porsi". If porsi1 is plural then porsi1 and porsi3 would refer to the same things.

ok, porsi1 changed  to "located".


And if you use "ce'o" to create a sequence (definition (2b)), then it probably shouldn't be used in places for ordered plurals. 
 

plita2 - OK?
sarni2 - ?
three corners imply that all of them are to be specified.

Yes, I understood that, I was just wondering at the weirdness of the place structures. I guess the idea was that since geometric gismu mostly have weird place structures, if we are to create a new one it should come with a weird place structure as well. Shouldn't kubli3 and kerfa2

kurfa2.

be plural too? and kubli2 a number? The geometric gismu obviously need some revision.

Another plural: morna2

all of them fixed.

I agree that a language à la John Wilkins (i.e. strictly regularised) would be useful for geometry (unlike many other  semantic classes).

Currently I have no ideas but may be there exists a classification of geometrical forms that we can apply to new fu'ivla.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.