Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

2010/10/11 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Whether or not to begin an utterance with {.i} was never the point of
> discussion. Whether or not {.i} is required for an utterance to be
> grammatical was never the point of the discussion. I am not, was not, and
> will not be making any "proposal" to change the grammar of Lojban to require
> {.i} in such cases as it is currently optional.
>
> The POINT of the discussion is, whether an utterance from a new speaker is a
> new "text" or not.

If by "text" you mean "the chunk of input you feed to the parser to
check for grammaticality", then yes, normally an utterance from a new
speaker is a new "text" (there may be rare exceptions).

If by "text" you mean something else. I don't know, it depends what
you mean by it.

What do you mean by "text"?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

.i mi na pensi lodu'u zo'oi.text. du pa jufra .i pensi lodu'u zo'oi.text. du lo jufra pe pa se casnu

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.