Re: [bpfk] BPFK work

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Whether or not to begin an utterance with {.i} was never the point of
> discussion. Whether or not {.i} is required for an utterance to be
> grammatical was never the point of the discussion. I am not, was not, and
> will not be making any "proposal" to change the grammar of Lojban to require
> {.i} in such cases as it is currently optional.
>
> The POINT of the discussion is, whether an utterance from a new speaker is a
> new "text" or not.

If by "text" you mean "the chunk of input you feed to the parser to
check for grammaticality", then yes, normally an utterance from a new
speaker is a new "text" (there may be rare exceptions).

If by "text" you mean something else. I don't know, it depends what
you mean by it.

What do you mean by "text"?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.