[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] Re: {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra





On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se> wrote:
Yes, obviously the text reopening semantics can not be
formalized in a grammar.

Maybe forget about {fa'ei} until we figure {fa'ai} out.

Maybe we should just forget about all of it since this is about continuing sentences, not texts. la.alis. is a text. It is not /a/ jufra.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.