[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] Re: {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, obviously the text reopening semantics can not be
>> formalized in a grammar.
>>
>> Maybe forget about {fa'ei} until we figure {fa'ai} out.
>
> Maybe we should just forget about all of it since this is about continuing
> sentences, not texts. la.alis. is a text. It is not /a/ jufra.

A sentence is just one special kind of text, a very short one.

In any case, the same problems apply to a text in general or to a
single sentence.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.