[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] Re: {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra



2010/10/13 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, obviously the text reopening semantics can not be
>> formalized in a grammar.
>>
>> Maybe forget about {fa'ei} until we figure {fa'ai} out.
>
> Maybe we should just forget about all of it since this is about continuing
> sentences, not texts. la.alis. is a text. It is not /a/ jufra.

A sentence is just one special kind of text, a very short one.

.i.ienaicai pa jufra cu na mintu pa se casnu .a pa cukta .a pa te tavla

It doesn't matter if a sentence is a text. A book is a text, a discussion is a text, a web page is a text. All men are human, but not all humans are men.
 
In any case, the same problems apply to a text in general or to a
single sentence.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.




--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.