Re: [lojban] la za'e filjvocedra (The Age of Easy Lujvo)

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

2010/10/5 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Actually, I just had a thought. What would you understand {.djepav.} to
> mean? Or, to do something grammatically illegal, {djepa}?

Mmm... I like illegal! :)

It still has the problem of being potentially confusing for speakers
of some languages, but from a purely Lojbanic perspective it's a great
way to get rid of the place structure of djedi.

Could we do something similar for months?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

{masti} only has a cv'v form rafsi, so we couldn't do thee same thing as for {djeNN}, as in make a fake gismu. It would be {ma'ipa} et al., which break up into {ma'i NN}. We could do {.ma'ipav.} et al., and go into the hex digits for 10 - 12, assuming they have rafsi.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.