Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

I suspect he means 'UIda'ai' which was apparently devised just for the purpose 
given.  But is illegitmate logically, without a whole mess of further 
considerations. (see previous letter and my reply).



----- Original Message ----
From: Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 7:32:18 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Time for the perenial other-centric-.ui conversation

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:01 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Why not, given that it is built on 'ie'?
>> Gee, I hope someone can do better than xorxes.
>
>
> Because of the bloody definition of the bloody word {pei}.
>
> UIdai is used to indicate another's UI-state, why do you have such a problem
> with UIpei, which is used to ask about it?

UIdai is *not* used to indicate another's UI-state, but the speaker's
UI-state and the fact that it is empathetic in nature.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.