Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another

["John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

I think the earlier discussion was exactly about { po'o}, so your suggestion proposes one possible solution.

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 4, 2011, at 6:53 AM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3 December 2011 18:50, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I think we have this discussion before, and I never can remember what (if
>> anything) was decided.  In strict logic-text fashion, "I admire only you"  does
>> not entail "I admire you" but it does seem pragmatically odd.
> 
> Would you say that the distinction between the strict and usual
> fashions (entailing and not entailing "you") is relevant to the
> difference between {no na'ebo do} and {do po'o}?
> 
> 
> mu'o
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.