Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Because you can't say {lo tatoebas jufra} without the merge, and because
> it's reversed from the other two examples:

My starting point was the original post which commented on a sentence
by la gleki that contained {lo tatoebas jufra}.

That's irrelevant. You can currently say {lo jufra pe la tatoebas}, you cannot currently say {lo.tatoebas. jufra}.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.