Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Reuse request

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Are the other ones I found that might be misusing ".e". Off the top of your
> head, do they seem to be all the ones you saw?

I spotted this one:

54. cy: xu do'o se panzi
   by: go'i .i mi'a se panzi lo cimei noi me pa nanla .e re nixli

I think that expands as "noi me pa nanla gi'e me re nixli".

I looked at that one, and in both camxes and jboski it parses as "me (pa nanla .e re nixli)".

changing it to "... me pa nanla gi'e re nixli" (or "... je...") results in it not parsing in either, so I'm pretty sure my usage is correct in this case.
 

I also saw some ungrammatical sentences in:

65. ji'a la.baluz. .e la.djin. se bersa la.jos. .i la.jos. bruna mi
.iji'a la.jos. famti ci mi'a panzi .iji'a jy. se panzi la.stiv. .e
la.teris. .i la.stiv. .e la.teris. se famti mi .iji'a lo go'i cu tamne
ci mi'a panzi .ije ci mi'a panzi cu tamne lo go'i

I think you want "lo ci panzi be mi'a", or "lo mi'a ci panzi".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

Yes. "ci mi'a panzi" is a jufra of it's own. My mistake.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.