Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Reuse request

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> 54. cy: xu do'o se panzi
>>    by: go'i .i mi'a se panzi lo cimei noi me pa nanla .e re nixli
>>
>> I think that expands as "noi me pa nanla gi'e me re nixli".
>
> I looked at that one, and in both camxes and jboski it parses as "me (pa
> nanla .e re nixli)".

Of course. And "broda ko'a .e ko'e" also parses as "broda (ko'a .e
ko'e)". I'm talking about what the ".e" short form expands to. It
always expands to a bridi connective.

> changing it to "... me pa nanla gi'e re nixli" (or "... je...") results in
> it not parsing in either, so I'm pretty sure my usage is correct in this
> case.

I don't understand what you mean.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.