On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Jorge Llambías
<jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 54. cy: xu do'o se panzi
>> by: go'i .i mi'a se panzi lo cimei noi me pa nanla .e re nixli
>>
>> I think that expands as "noi me pa nanla gi'e me re nixli".
>
> I looked at that one, and in both camxes and jboski it parses as "me (pa
> nanla .e re nixli)".
Of course. And "broda ko'a .e ko'e" also parses as "broda (ko'a .e
ko'e)". I'm talking about what the ".e" short form expands to. It
always expands to a bridi connective.
I don't understand what you mean by this expansion thing, especially since you seem to be contradicting yourself, as you previously said that ".e" expands to ".ije".
Is there perhaps some site I can be directed to that explains this?
> changing it to "... me pa nanla gi'e re nixli" (or "... je...") results in
> it not parsing in either, so I'm pretty sure my usage is correct in this
> case.
I don't understand what you mean.
mu'o mi'e xorxes