Re: [lojban] gender

[tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>]

On 18 November 2011 18:51, vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> How about if we just let {cinse} mean gender, and move sexuality to {gledji}?
>>
>> Yes, we could generalize {cinse} up to a point where it would cover
>> the spectrum mentioned by J.E.C. above and would provide a more
>> productive rafsi:
>>
>> gincinse - genetic gender
>> jikcinse - social gender
>> klucinse - cultural gender
>> etc.
>
> I'm actually talking about making {cinse} less general -- it already
> means gender; I just want to make it not also mean sexuality.

How do you understand the term "sexuality" in the definition of
{cinse}? What is the sort of ka that you don't want the x2 to exhibit?


> I also really want to have the explicit x3 and x4 places of {cinse} when
> talking about gender, so that I can say things like {cinse fi so'i da}
> or {cinse fo ma}.

What would those places mean? Would they not be expressible through BAIs?


mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.