[lojban] Re: {le} in xorlo

[Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com>]

On Apr 24, 1:16 am, And Rosta <and.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> one of the things about your putative equivalence between lo ku
> and zo'e that makes me uncomfortable is that zo'e should
> arguably include zi'o, but lo ku certainly shouldn't.

I actually think zo'e should not include zi'o.  My basic assumption is
that zo'e should always be exactly equivalent to leaving the sumti
out.
And I don't think {klama} can mean {klama zi'o}.  That's because zi'o
alters the predicate fundamentally.  So it's maybe no longer {klama}.

For the same reason, I think {klama} should not include {to'e klama}.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.