Re: [lojban] non-ka properties

[Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>]

On 20 June 2011 16:56, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/6/20 Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>:
>> On 20 June 2011 16:30, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, "xukau" returns a strictly binary value. It's not the
>>> exisitence of the "kau" per se that makes it binary. It's that the
>>> answer to "xu" is only binary, so "xukau" can only be a binary value.
>>
>> Oh, fine. Then I wonder how do {ka broda} and {ka makau jei ce'u broda}
>> compare to each other. Would you say they are close? The same?
>>
>> A nice thing is that {jei} has a x2.
>
>  I don't think you are saying what you think you are trying to say
> (although what you said is grammatical).  "jei" is an abstractor, like
> ka.  It takes a bridi and makes it into a selbri, who meaning is "..is
> the truth value of [bridi]", just like ka is "...is the property of
> [bridiness]-ness"

I am pretty aware of what {jei} is.
How do you understand {ka makau jei ce'u broda}?

>                  --gejyspa
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.