Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: [jboske] killing kau, (continued)
  • Re: [jboske] killing kau, Jordan DeLong
  • RE: [jboske] killing kau, Invent Yourself
• Subject:? Re: [jboske] killing kau, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Subject:? Re: [jboske] killing kau, Nick Nicholas
• Re: [jboske] loi: quantitative claims, Jorge Llambias
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, Jordan DeLong
    • RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, And Rosta
    • Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, John Cowan
      • Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE:, Bob LeChevalier
      • RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, Jorge Llambias
  • RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, Jorge Llambias
    • RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE:, Robert LeChevalier
      • Re: zifsnu: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, Jordan DeLong
  • Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, Jorge Llambias
    • RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re:lo'edu'u, And Rosta
• OFF-TOPIC: Sampson, And Rosta
  • Re: [jboske] OFF-TOPIC: Sampson, John Cowan
• Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau), Jorge Llambias
  • Re: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau), Jordan DeLong
• Re: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau, Jorge Llambias
  • RE: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau, Jorge Llambias
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u, Jorge Llambias
• lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, Nick Nicholas
    • RE: [jboske] Re: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
    • RE: [jboske] Re: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
      • Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?), Invent Yourself
      • RE: [jboske] Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?), And Rosta
      • Re: [jboske] Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?), John Cowan
      • Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, throwing_back_the_apple <xod@thestonecutters.net>
      • RE: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, And Rosta
      • Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, John Cowan
      • Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, Jordan DeLong
      • Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, Invent Yourself
      • Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, Robert LeChevalier
      • CON: Substance is not Collective (was: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?)), Invent Yourself
      • Re: [jboske] CON: Substance is not Collective (was: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?)), Robert LeChevalier
      • Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we, John Cowan
      • Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, Jordan DeLong
      • CON Substance is not Collective (was: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?)), Invent Yourself
      • Re: [jboske] CON Substance is not Collective (was: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?)), Jordan DeLong
      • Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, John Cowan
      • RE: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, And Rosta
      • Re: [jboske] Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, John Cowan
      • Interim summary of gadri types (was: RE: Re: Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards aresolution?, And Rosta
      • Off-site jboske help (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?), Invent Yourself
• Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, Jorge Llambias
  • RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
    • RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, Bob LeChevalier
      • a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
      • Re: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, Invent Yourself
      • RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can weconverge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
      • RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can weconverge towards a resolution?, Invent Yourself
      • RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: canweconverge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
      • RE: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: canweconverge towards a resolution?, Invent Yourself
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, Nick Nicholas
    • RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
      • RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, Invent Yourself
      • RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, Bob LeChevalier
      • jboske & linguistics (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
    • Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, Jordan DeLong
  • RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, Nick Nicholas
    • RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?, And Rosta
• The singularisations, Nick Nicholas
  • RE: [jboske] The singularisations, And Rosta
• Gaps and Ungaps, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: [jboske] Gaps and Ungaps, Invent Yourself
    • factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, And Rosta
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, John Cowan
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, Invent Yourself
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, Jordan DeLong
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, Invent Yourself
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, John Cowan
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, Invent Yourself
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, Jordan DeLong
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, Invent Yourself
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, Jordan DeLong
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, John Cowan
      • Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps, Jordan DeLong
• Re: Subject:  Re: [jboske] killing kau, Jorge Llambias
  • =?x-unknown?q?Re=3A_Subject=3A=A0_Re=3A_=5Bjboske=5D_killing_ka?= =?x-unknown?q?u?=, Invent Yourself
• gadri schon wieder mal, Nick Nicholas
  • The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal), Invent Yourself
    • Re: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal), John Cowan
      • Re: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal), Jordan DeLong
      • RE: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal), And Rosta
  • Re: [jboske] gadri schon wieder mal, Robert LeChevalier
  • RE: [jboske] gadri schon wieder mal, And Rosta
• Re: Subject:† Re: killing kau, Nick Nicholas
• nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei, Robert LeChevalier
    • RE: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei, And Rosta
  • RE: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei, And Rosta
• Paper to consider on intensionals?, Nick Nicholas
  • RE: [jboske] Paper to consider on intensionals?, And Rosta