On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Jonathan Jones <
eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Jorge Llambías <
jjllambias@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Jonathan Jones <
eyeonus@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jorge Llambías <
jjllambias@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 54. cy: xu do'o se panzi
>> >> by: go'i .i mi'a se panzi lo cimei noi me pa nanla .e re nixli
>> >>
>> >> I think that expands as "noi me pa nanla gi'e me re nixli".
>> >
>> > I looked at that one, and in both camxes and jboski it parses as "me (pa
>> > nanla .e re nixli)".
>>
>> Of course. And "broda ko'a .e ko'e" also parses as "broda (ko'a .e
>> ko'e)". I'm talking about what the ".e" short form expands to. It
>> always expands to a bridi connective.
>
> I don't understand what you mean by this expansion thing, especially since
> you seem to be contradicting yourself, as you previously said that ".e"
> expands to ".ije".
I should have said it expands to "ge [bridi] gi [bridi]", since inexpands to a bridi connective.