Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• must lo'e be imaginary? (was: RE: kau
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• RE: [jboske] makau, dakau
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• RE: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [jboske] unbound ko'a (was: RE: kau
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• Re: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• RE: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• the two views of lVi (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• jei clani (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: [jboske] jei clani (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau)
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [jboske] sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• The singularisations
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• RE: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [jboske] jei clani (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• RE: [jboske] The singularisations
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: [jboske] loi: quantitative claims
  • From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [jboske] so, singulatives..
  • From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• Re: [jboske] loi'e = loi ?
  • From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: [jboske] Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: [jboske] loi: quantitative claims
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: [jboske] kau
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE:
  • From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [jboske] kau
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• RE: [jboske] Re: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• jboske & linguistics (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: Subject:  Re: [jboske] killing kau
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• gadri schon wieder mal
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• Re: Subject:† Re: killing kau
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: [jboske] nitcu x2 (was: RE: RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Paper to consider on intensionals?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• Re: [jboske] RE: lo'ie != lo'ei
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• apologies for allround slovenliness
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• le djacu (was Re: [jboske] kau)
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Beatles' legs (was: RE: loi'e = loi ?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a"
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• frequency of reified relations (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• stedu (be mi) (was: RE: kau
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• wondering: sepi'o zo du'au (was: RE: kau, take 2
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ?
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei)
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Unique == Misterhood? (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?)
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Off-site jboske help (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?)
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: [jboske] a personal gadri paradigm (was: RE: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal)
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: [jboske] individuation and masses (was: RE: mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ?
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: zifsnu: PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• =?x-unknown?q?Re=3A_Subject=3A=A0_Re=3A_=5Bjboske=5D_killing_ka?= =?x-unknown?q?u?=
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a"
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: [jboske] Needed boxes (was: lo'ie != lo'ei)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: le djacu (was Re: [jboske] kau)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal)
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• Re: [jboske] gadri schon wieder mal
  • From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>